Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2000, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:29:08 EST
Reply-To:     JKrevnov@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Rico Sapolich <JKrevnov@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Syncro U-joints/More than You Want to Know
Comments: To: vw4x4@fyi.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

In a message dated 1/13/00 4:24:31 AM, vw4x4@FYI.NET writes:

<< Most are unsucsessful with these. >>

Eric: I have been reluctant to enter the fray regarding Syncro u-joint replacement because I replaced mine only about 1Kmi ago. Pour a cup of coffee because this is going to be long.

I started to get a drivetrain vibration which got progressively worse. I, of course, checked the u-joints and cv's first. Everything appeared OK. Although it has never happened to me, I was hoping it was just a thrown wheel weight. In an attempt to isolate the problem, I decided to remove the driveshaft. By this time the u-joint had worn so much that its condition was obvious without removing the driveshaft. So much for checking the u-joints in situ.

Looking at the u-joints, I could not understand all the fuss on the list about replacing them. I started to realize that something was hinky here when I could not find replacements at the usual sources. I did an archive search and turned up some aftermarket P/N's and dimensions. I also turned up a posting describing the trails and tribulations of replacing them. This fellow said that after a few thousand miles his vibration was returning.

I called Sendell VW in Greensburg, PA and they said they have the u-joints in stock. Unfortunately, the parts guy had not heard the "center" when I asked for driveshaft u--joints so, he assumed I wanted CV joints. After several calls, they were unable to turn up u-joints or a remanufactured drive shaft. I did locate a used shaft but, I decided not to deal with that unknown quantity and just install new u-joints.

Armed with the dimensions (27mmX70mm) from the P/N I had found, I crawled under the van with a mike and a vernier caliper. The cup bore proved to be correct @ 27mm. The cross trunnion, cup-to-cup dimension was .006" shy of 70mm, measuring @ 2.750" right on the nuts. I figured that's close enough for a guy wearing bifocals and working in fading light.

I ordered Neapco, P/N 1-0321 u-joints from a local driveshaft fabricator. He said they would be of USA manufacture. He was wrong; they are made in Italy and branded by Neapco. I asked him about installing the u-joints and balancing the driveshaft and he said that balancing would not be needed if I was just replacing u-joints. Anyway, he did not have the right flanges to balance the Syncro driveshaft.

When I compared the Neapco's to the original part, I found the Neapco cross trunnion measurment to be about .008" greater. Also, the new retaining rings supplied were much thinner than the originals. Summing the differences in the make up dimension showed that the fit would be about .016" loose. I returned to the driveshaft specialist seeking thicker circlips. When I told him that the fit was about .016 loose, he said not to worry about it because the bottom of the cup has to have some room for grease. That didn't sound right to me, still, I seated the first 2 cups. That is when it really did not seem right with that 1/64th inch of side-to-side play.

I then called Neapco. They did not have an application listing for the Syncro either. They did tell me that the fit for that u-joint should be .002" tight to .0035" loose with a mean of .0015" loose. Now, that was more like it. I tried to find thicker retaining rings so that I could dress them to the required dimension. Since none of my regular vendors had them on hand and I did not want to wait any longer ( this was taking too long as it was), I decided to use shims.

One curious thing, one trunnion required .016" of shims while the other, on the same joint took .020". I wish I had saved the old circlips so that I could see if they were selected to provide for the variations in fit up. I did not have any shimstock in .0005 increments so, I left one trunnion .001" loose.

And finally! All I can say is so far so good. I have one question for all who have bothered to read this: WHY THE HELL DOES VW NOT SELL THE RIGHT U-JOINT??

Richard


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.