Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:34:06 -0500
Reply-To: Caston/Payne <happycampers@PICUSNET.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Caston/Payne <happycampers@PICUSNET.COM>
Subject: EMZ's language (no vanagon content)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000219002513.25435A-100000@yoda>
Content-Type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii"
>> <<<< EMZ wrote:<<Go back to school....everyones a know it all.....
>> No reason to reply, another one in the filter file.> >>
>>
>> BenT SF wrote:<<Absolute hit and run tactic. Afraid to get a
credible response, perhaps?>
At 12:33 AM -0500 2/19/2000, EMZ wrote:
> I work in a co. that has done most of the research for todays motor
>oils. Motion and movenment is our business. We make the most precise
>machines in the world. If we don't know about oils we would have been
>gone years ago. Instead we support some of the biggest co.'s in the
world,
>in motion. This includes all of the automotive industry.
>
> When someone is looking for help, and they come up with half wit
>ideas, that counters all the reseach in the industry, there is
simplly
>no reason to even try with them.
>
>
> Eric 86-VW4x4
> vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z
> Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler
You don't work in sales or PR by chance, do you? ;-)
Eric I'm just going to say this and this only:
Often you have <underline>really</underline> valuable input.
More often you attach to that valuable input snide remarks that
belittle others for no reason. I guess you must have emerged from the
womb complete in all your knowledge. How else would
<underline>you</underline> have learned, based on that second
paragraph?
Until presented with evidence to the contrary, we all hold our ideas
about certain things as true. All the research at one time pointed to
a flat Earth. Then someone thought differently and tested the theory.
But you know what? That person then had to convince THE WORLD that
their previously held truisms were false. I suppose, had you been in
that explorer's place, you would have gone back to port and not told
anyone about it. Because after all, they had "half wit" ideas about
what you knew to be inaccurate so there was "no reason to even try with
them".
I think someone looking for help, with inaccurate ideas in tow,
warrants understanding supported with the scientific data to support
the new idea. I respect your understanding of things that I don't.
But, I for one, am tired of hearing you shoot off your mouth about how
everyone should know this or that. You're just unkind. My filter
works, too! So, consider this; if the majority of the list begins to
filter your posts, who's reading them? Prolly just yourself. So,
happy reading.
Later,
Dave C.
Williamsburg, VA
zzzzzzzzzz__
|E[__] [__]|[_]\\
| _DC&SP | _ ||
* * * =-( )---------( )--=
'85 GL Westy (His)
'91 Cabriolet (Hers)