Date:         Sun, 12 Mar 2000 07:10:22 EST
Reply-To:     RAlanen@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         RAlanen@AOL.COM
Subject:      Re: List Sticker debacle
Comments: cc: mruskin@pangea.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In a message dated 3/11/00 6:02:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
LISTSERV@GERRY.VANAGON.COM writes:

<< List Sticker debacle >>
<<If the list admin(s) approve, I would recommend that he put the official
<<question(s) to the list, with proper instructions and an explanation of the
<<voting methodology.

<<We would then be bound to the results of the vote, with further discussion
<<becoming irrelevant to the resulting action of the list.

<<What say you, Kind List admin(s?)?>>

    I'll agree on this too just adding that the Vanagon.org thing be thought
off.  Would be a simple issue of changing the winning design from .com to
.org so no need to redesign the battleship.
    The idea of having a run off choosing five of the best of the best then
one in a final vote sounds good to me.  Maybe we choose two winners.  The
cost of printing these things can't be all that much.  Has anyone looked into
that ?  I believe there was a post from someone offering to get this part of
the task done.  What's the cost for doing one style versus two styles ?

Cheers

Frank Condelli
'87 Westy & Lionel Trains
Almonte, On
Visit me on the web.......> <A
HREF="http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/busindex.html">Frank Condelli & Associates<
/A>  or
http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/busindex.html
Want to win $10,000? Click to enter!!
 <A HREF="http://irecommend-it.com/sh.e?22EC343C3B75">iRecommend-It Public
Page for RAlanen@aol.com</A>