Date:         Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:32:23 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@IBM.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@IBM.NET>
Subject:      Re: To table or not to table
Comments: To: Roq8cyans@AOL.COM
In-Reply-To:  <b5.249453d.262f8117@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 17:37 4/19/2000, Rusty Johnson wrote:
> >Hmmm, interesting. So the rear table I have is actually the front one.
> >Because it does swing over and lives quite happily above the top-loading
> >storage units. I like that feature though. So I might just buy another
> >front table and arm...

My large (rear) table is mounted asymmetrically.  If fits the space one way
but not the other.  It's big enough for two people to sit side-by-side. My
small table is also mounted asymetrically, but fits either way.  I keep the
big one stowed overhead, behind the folded part of the upper bed, and the
little one mounted on the arm over the lockers in rear.  I use the front
arm to hold a garbage bag reachable from the front seats.

david
David Beierl - Providence, RI
  http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
'84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
'85 GL "Poor Relation"