Date:         Fri, 12 May 2000 21:03:03 -0700
Reply-To:     Mark Drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: Fridge topic
Comments: To: David Beierl <dbeierl@ibm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I was referring more to the idea that the regulator could be knocked off
or the fitting between it and the tank split. That POL device on my
Marshall 290 says .9 gpm. So I guess as long as the leak is greater than
what, 1000 unlit burners on full, the safety device will shut it off?
Don't know, but if that .9 means gallons per minute, it could make a
pretty large cloud fast. Is this correct?

Mark

David Beierl wrote:
>
> At 23:16 5/12/2000, Mark Drillock wrote:
> >of the gas line could result in a fire. If the tank regulator was
> >involved, the result might be spectacular. This seems unlikely but it is
>
> Mark, the POL spud on the regulator has a so-called "excess-flow" device
> (if not it's highly illegal) that shuts off if the flow is too
> high.  That's one reason why using a BBQ-type regulator is so bad, because
> it's unlikely that the POL fitting will be correct.  So anything downstream
> of that fitting that causes uncontrolled venting will be quickly shut
> off.  If the valve gets knocked off the tank, that's a different story
> entirely, but just having the valve open has been covered by the approval
> authorities.
>
> david
> David Beierl - Providence, RI
>   http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
> '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
> '85 GL "Poor Relation"