Date:         Sun, 14 May 2000 16:05:06 -0700
Reply-To:     "Keith & Lynn C." <clayard1@NETCOM.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Keith & Lynn C." <clayard1@NETCOM.CA>
Subject:      Re: Fw: HILL VOTES ON IP REGULATION TUESDAY: SOS
Comments: To: "J. Kelly" <kellyjm@UTINET.NET>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Here is a novel idea.......let's keep the discussion to Vanagons.
If you want to chit chat about this or other non-Vanagon issues, use a
different forum please. Quit wastin bandwidth and cloggin up the
inbasket.!!!!
Keith
81 Westy.

"J. Kelly" wrote:

> Huh?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Beierl" <dbeierl@ibm.net>
> To: <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 4:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: HILL VOTES ON IP REGULATION TUESDAY: SOS
>
> > Ah!  Now we get to the interesting question.  I bet the answer is not
> simple.
> >
> > david
> >
> > At 16:06 5/14/2000, t wrote:
> > >...you have not made a convincing argument that this
> > >should not be a fee based system. If the use of voice sevices over the
> > >net continues to increase, who will foot the bill?  ME! and YOU!
> > >Irrespective of whether we use the service or not. I pay my long
> > >distance bills, why should I pay yours?
> >
> > David Beierl - Providence, RI
> >   http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
> > '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
> > '85 GL "Poor Relation"
> >

[text/html]