Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2000, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 16 May 2000 21:50:14 -0400
Reply-To:     ed <edevinney@ANENT.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         ed <edevinney@ANENT.COM>
Organization: Pismo Beach Institute for Advanced Leisure Studies
Subject:      Heat in an air-cooled Syncro (long, boring, self-involved)
Comments: To: syncro <Syncro@onelist.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
              x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"

No, not an air-cooled Syncro from the factory, anyway. In my quest to make our Syncro that-which-it-is-not, I'm down to three contenders for engine:

1.9TD 1.8T 3.2L 911 flat-6

Yes, it's a darned eclectic list. Each has advantages and disadvantages, each makes for a particular kind of vehicle. I've got the means and intent to do one of them, just have to decide on which. I would appreciate hearing from owners who have executed any of them (in addition to Karl M :-). Have ruled out the Subaru for reasons of ground clearance, and the 2L four for poor cost/performance ratio - since I'll not have time to do the work myself, any conversion will be pricey.

I've thought through most of the details of each, with the exception of how to work the heat in the 911 conversion.

Some folks have apparently used an oil-water heat exchanger to drive the stock system. Good idea, but the oil temp in my own 911 takes a donkey's year to get up, especially when the weather is cold - 11 quarts of oil is a lot to heat up. One could electrically heat the water til the oil comes up to temp, but seems klugey and in any case retaining water heat requires pumps, controls and other cruft. MSDS recommends reverting to the air-cooled model of heat, which is intriguing, so not being a Vanagon expert I started studying Bentley.

Now the first thing I see is that the late air-cooled air handler and the wasserboxer air handler look damn near identical, with the h2o version having a heat exchanger instead of one of the baffle plates. Notably, the wasserboxer has provision for an auxiliary heat booster on certain non-US Syncros that looks exactly like the old air-cooled extra heater. And the place where this thing enters is exactly where the ductwork from the engine arrives on the air-cooled Vanagon.

So am I correct to think that I could take a page from Bulley's bus-heater treatise and build myself an insulated duct from the 911 heat exchangers to the air handler, following the routing of the Syncro aux heater ductwork? Will this function as an exact replacement for the h2o heat exchanger, or is the ducting inside the air handler going to route this "aux" heat just to the cabin, say, and not to the defroster?

If I have to revert to the old-style air handler (and thus pull the dash and reengineer a buttload of stuff) this deal is a non-starter. Any and all informed opinions would be appreciated!

Cheers -

ed devinney


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.