Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2000, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 23 May 2000 12:38:39 -0700
Reply-To:     Ron 'Coyote' Lussier <coyote@MACROMEDIA.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Ron 'Coyote' Lussier <coyote@MACROMEDIA.COM>
Subject:      Re: MIME Message! (non-vw related)
Comments: To: Jeff <jeff@ELECTROPONICS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <1253019696-77848866@electroponics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> <rant> > > Aaaaagghhh! > > html is for the WEB! > If you want auto-virus-cookie-ad-uglyass mail, then just accept > it as progress. > I however, believe that email should be TEXT ONLY. > > The marketing droids are trying to push for the html email so > they can put ADS > in and TRACK their mails. > > </rant>

I respectably disagree. HTML stands for 'Hypertext Markup Language' and is not web-specific. I've personally implemented a chat interface using HTML. It's designed for document formatting, much as TEX or SGML.

When the Macintosh first came out, Windows users (who then had no choice of fonts or styles) ranted on and on that no one needed multiple fonts or boldfaced text. And granted, there were a lot of style-deficit people who created god-forsaken memos before they finally settled down.

Likewise, some now say that email documents have no need for fonts or styles. To these people, email should only be written in a fixed font without embellishment. Though there is a lot to say for minimalism, I myself prefer to use occasional italic or boldface to emphasize words or phrases. These capabilities have been available in the publishing world for some time, and now the tools are available for our use.

The argument against HTML formatting on the basis of the number of characters in the letter is a specious one. The difference for text messages is not noticeable. (Embedded graphics are another matter entirely.) Likewise, the use of HTML as a formatting tool does not in any way translate to either tracking or ads.

If there are poor unfortunates who are actually paying by the byte for their email, as David suggested, I would suggest that you get an ISP with a reasonable fee structure. There are many flat-monthly-fee services available.

Coyote

-- /\_/\ ____ Ron 'Coyote' Lussier ( ) \ _/__ coyote@macromedia.com \ / \X / 1991 Syncro Westy 'Francis' 1.650.481.4847 \_/ \/ San Francisco, CA


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.