Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2000, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 29 May 2000 22:05:01 -0700
Reply-To:     Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Subject:      Re: R12 vs. R134
Comments: To: EricJSmall@AOL.COM

I have read on this list of happy users of R-134. When I mentioned that to my mechanic here in Phoenix, he asked if the advice came from "back east". He told me that here in the desert, R-134 basically does not work.

Karl Wolz

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Small" <EricJSmall@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 7:50 PM Subject: Re: R12 vs. R134

> Blitz, as already has been pointed out R-12 is a superior refrigerant to > R-134. I also subscribe to the conspiracy theory behind the banning of R-12. > Much research seems to indicated that this is all based on bad and profit > biased science, but what are you going to do.... This is America and you have > to take the few bad things with the many good things. > > In any case, I performed an R-12 to R-134 conversion on my 1990 Oldsmobile > last year in conjunction with a complete AC system replacement (except the > compressor which was a GM "R-134 ready" compressor). My experience was as I > expected- it did not cool as quickly or efficiently and the compressor > worked harder. Overall it worked fine for my A/C needs in Maine. If I were > back in Texas it would likely have been unacceptable. > > There are 2 significant reasons for NOT doing this conversion in your > Vanagon. First, as I mentioned, your compressor will have to work harder. > It is already old -this could push it over the edge then you will be spending > money. Secondly, -and more importantly in the short term- the R-134 > molecule is much smaller than that of R-12. If there are leaks or even weak > spots in your old system they will be big leaks with R-134. > > My van has required a recharge nearly every year as long as I've owned it. A > recharge costs about $125-$160 depending on region and refrigerant > availability/prices. In my mind its a cost of being cool... R-12 will be > available for a long time -I budget for the annual expense and think bad > things about the individuals responsible for the current arrangement -who > ever they are! > > Good-luck... I hope this is helpful > Eric Small > So. Portland, Maine > '86GL Weekender >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.