Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2000, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:28:38 -0700
Reply-To:     Stuart MacMillan <macmillan@home.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stuart MacMillan <macmillan@home.com>
Subject:      Re: Shorter oil pan for Subaru engine? S.A. comp. to Subie?
Comments: To: John Andrew <johna@telluridecolorado.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

The oil pan problem is the main reason I've rejected this conversion. Right now the only solution is to cut the pan down and weld it back together, shorten the oil pick up, and run with three quarts of oil. Not acceptable to me given that you need to remove the engine cover to check the oil. Kennedy keeps talking about developing a cast alloy oil pan for this conversion. We'll see.

If you are a good metal worker or know one, you could design a flatter pan with "outrigger" compartments that could be welded to the cut off stock pan. There might even be money to be made from this, either from the converted pans themselves or from selling the plans. Something like this:

| | | < remains of stock pan with flange __ / | \ __ |___|_--_|____| < include windage baffles around oil pick up

^ drain plug

> John Andrew wrote: > > Hi, > I just sold my 1980 Westy and am ready to address a new engine for my > 1984 Westy. A friend of mine just did the 2.2 Subaru conversion and I > was able to drive it. I loved the power increase! And his is an > automatic! Fit looks good and sounds good too. My concern is the oil > pan. He has already ripped the pan off once when it was towed. Does > anyone know of a source for a lower profile Subaru oil pan? Some of > the roads I like to take will definitely pose a problem for the lower > clearance. > Just out of curiosity, how does the Subaru 2.2 compare HP wise to the > South African Conversion? A brand new engine and electronics sure are > appealing. > > Thanks all, > John Andrew 1984 Westy "Schmooo", maybe soon to be "Schmooobaru"

-- Stuart MacMillan Seattle

'84 Vanagon Westfalia '65 MGB (Driven since 1969) '74 MGB GT (Restoring)

Assisting on Restoration: '72 MGB GT (Daughter's) '64 MGB (Son's)

Parts cars: '68 & '73 MGB, '67 MGB GT


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.