Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2000, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 24 Jul 2000 02:17:34 PDT
Reply-To:     Mark Dorm <mark_hb@hotmail.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Dorm <mark_hb@hotmail.com>
Subject:      Re: Weep No More For Me
Comments: To: djs@gene.com
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

can you have two water pumps running at the same time?

>From: Daniel Schmitz <djs@gene.com> >Reply-To: Daniel Schmitz <djs@gene.com> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Weep No More For Me >Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:30:04 -0700 > >Having failed to progress in mathematics past college algebra, I am hard >pressed >to ascertain the answers to the following questions: > >If the coolant was pumped uphill and stayed there, and the pump continued >to >pump, wouldn't something near the front of the van eventually burst and >make a >mess? And, based on the original poster's assumption that the water pump >has to >work relatively hard to pump coolant uphill, would it do less real work if >the >van were constantly driven downhill? > >These are questions for which a differential equation appears unequal to >the >task. > >Dan >'87 Westfalia, with optional, down-slope-optimized cooling system (parked >on a >hill) >'82 Adventurewagen, with hardly any cooling system at all >'75 Porsche 914, same as above > > >"John D. Stepto" wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The Gunnings <ngunn@landmarknet.net> > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > Date: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 1:24 PM > > Subject: Weep No More For Me > > > > > > > >One of the weakest links in the waterboxer design is > > >the is the constant strain on the waterpump to push coolant uphill to >the > > >front radiator. > > > > Actually, the pump is straining to push coolant uphill because the >coolant > > turns around and goes back down hill and pulls the equal amount back up. > > Its a closed system and energy potential (mass x gravity x height) is >almost > > equal at the pump. If the coolant was pumped uphill and stayed there, >then > > the work done by the pump would be the the (mass the coolant moved) x > > gravity x (the height from the pump to the top of the coolant level). >Of > > coarse, the level is constantly changing and you would end up with a >simple > > differential equation. > > > > Is it Friday yet? > > > > John > >-- >Dan >__________________________________________________ >Dan Schmitz - Genentech Automation Engineering >djs@gene.com (650) 225-6119 >__________________________________________________ > >"I'll so offend to make offense a skill >Redeeming time when men least think I will" > >W. Shakespeare >Henry IV, Part 1

________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.