Date:         Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:20:35 -0700
Reply-To:     t <vbob@primenet.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         t <vbob@primenet.com>
Subject:      Re: FW: Last word about my sig file
Comments: To: "Carrington, Tom" <TCarrington@ReliTech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Perhaps in the times of 1200kBaud modems. In this day and age of
multi-meg downloads, billions of "arty" nude fotographs, and wave/mp3
files coming out the yin/yang, Mr. Bulleys couple of extra lines don't
amount to a hill of beans on a gnat's ass. I suggest anyone afraid of
loading up their 8 gig hard drive with gmbully sig files, use liberal
use of the filter that dumps his writings into the bitbucket. Of course
you do lose what is most important.... he has a lot to say that helps me
and every other person on the list that bothers to pay attention.
I think the subject should be closed.

tim o'brien (too lazy to make a sig file)



"Carrington, Tom" wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: =David-M= [mailto:dmcs@cyburban.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:15 PM
> To: Vanagon Mailing List
> Subject: Last word about my sig file
>
> Re: Matthew Bulley <gmbulley@bulley-hewlett.com>
> >
> >My sig file is of my own writing and is not in anyway compensated by >the
> >CNU. I am an enigmatic zealot, as many of you know. The sigfile, for >now,
> >is my call to actionfor myself and others.
> >
> Its considered very rude and inconsiderate to have an email signature of
> more than 2 or 3 lines. It also contributes to clogging up internet
> traffic, one of the things you seem to be against.