Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2000, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 5 Aug 2000 01:54:33 -0400
Reply-To:     Miguel Calvin <mcalvin@ican.net>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Miguel Calvin <mcalvin@ican.net>
Subject:      Re: off road in a Vanagon Was Tires
Comments: To: Jim A <jrasite@eoni.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I don't know about the later loafs, but the manual from my 71 westy says: empty - 3228 lbs Max GVW - 4828 lbs GAW 2226front 2602rear With me and some stuff as below about 3550 lbs Ground clearance - 7.3" turning circle - 40' 1st gear x final drive = 20.425:1 multiply this by 60 horsepower = 1225 at the tires in 1st divide by 3550 to get .345 abitrary traction units/pound at the tires in 1st.

And my 83 Vanagon Westy doorjamb sticker says empty - ? lbs Max GVW - 5160 lbs GAW 2425front 2866rear With me, some odds and ends, and a partial tank of gas the Vanagon weighed 4000lbs on the scales at the dump. Ground clearance - 7.4" turning circle - 35' 1st gear x final drive = 18.3708:1 multiply this by 82 horsepower = 1506 at the tires in 1st divide by 4000 to get .377 abitrary traction units/pound at the tires in 1st.

So that should help to clarify things (you like my twisted math ?;-)).

The Vanagon is heavier, has about the same weight distribution, and has slightly *more* ground clearance, has a wider track by 8", and turns tighter. The body is 6" longer, 3" taller and 3" wider. The wheelbase is 2.3" longer and about 8" wider.

Horsepower and torque are up about 30% from the 1600dp, but the difference is much smaller when compared as power to weight ratios. 59 lbs/hp in 71 versus 49 lbs/hp in 83

My college mechanics teacher would slap me silly if he saw this...

Miguel

Jim A wrote: > > I beg to differ... My experience tells me that the Vanagon is lighter, not > heavier. That would be in keeping with engineering advances made over the > years. I suspect that if one put a couple of sacks of sand in the back they > just might get through some of the rough stuff. > > Jim Arnott > WetWesties > Union, OR


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.