Date:         Sun, 6 Aug 2000 01:56:12 -0400
Reply-To:     Bob O'Shaughnessy <vanagon@columbus.rr.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Bob O'Shaughnessy <vanagon@columbus.rr.com>
Subject:      Re: Air vs. Water - pro's and con's
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

THX0980@aol.com (THX0980@aol.com) said on the date of 8/5/00 8:15 PM

>From ' 79 1/2 to ' 83 1/2 the Vanagon came with the Type4 2.0L Air-cooled
>Eng. The 1.9L Wasserboxer started in the 83.5 model year. The original
>concept was to power the Vanagon with an air-cooled eng. Emmissions
>standards
>in the US made this impossible, thusly the conversion to H2O cooled.
>Beckett


     Perhaps, but in 82 (in the US, maybe earlier overseas) a 1.6L
diesel, water-cooled engine was available in the Vanagon.
     I hadn't heard the story about the emissions before.  If that were
true, wouldn't there be air-cooled Vanagons somewhere in the world past
83?

_________________________________________________________

Bob O'Shaughnessy,         Columbus, OH
vanagon@columbus.rr.com
99 A3 Jetta TDI
85GL with basic Westy interior
74 Bus (Dad's)
72 Wife, 94 Rabbit, 95 Cat, 96 cat, 98 Kid
52 House