Date:         Sat, 12 Aug 2000 21:03:44 -0700
Reply-To:     Rennie Wible <volksdragon@earthlink.net>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Rennie Wible <volksdragon@earthlink.net>
Subject:      Re: 1.9 vs. 2.1 heads
Comments: To: david kelly <dkcomet@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If you are going through that many heads in that little time, I would
say the effect is the heads.  What you need to find is the cause of your
problem.

Rennie
VolksDragon@earthlink.net
Los Angeles

61 crew cab
65 convertible
84 vanagon
93 fox
wanna synchro!

david kelly wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I sent out a cry for help & got some response, but am
> hoping for a more definitive answer.
>
> Here's my dilemma:
>
> I have a 1990 syncro w/ a 2.1L wasserleaker. I have
> one NEW AMC head on one side & an older VW head w/ a
> hairline crack on the other side.
>
> I have a line on a 1984 1.9L head in excellent shape -
> reconditioned, not resurfaced.
>
> Will I have problems having a 2.1L on one side & a
> 1.9L on the other side? I hear the valves are a bit
> different & they may create different compression that
> could screw up the computer.
>
> Has anyone done this successfully? Being my 6th head
> on this engine in less than 2 years, I want it to be
> the last for a while.
>
> Please send direct replies if possible,
> Thanks,
>
> David Kelly
> Seattle, Wa.
> 1990 Syncro 15"
> 1963 Comet Convertible
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com/