The 2.1 has much more power at the bottom end and noticeably more at all rpms. I have owned several of both, all with manual trannys. Power steering and A/C rob some power. Many 1.9s have neither so they would feel stronger in comparison. I have had a couple 2.1s without PS and they really moved. Mark Benjamin Tan wrote: > > In a message dated 8/17/00 7:51:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, JordanVw@aol.com > writes: > > << I'd just like to hear a few other peoples opinions about which they > prefer.. > i have a 1.9L automatic van, and a 2.1L automatic van >> > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.