Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2000, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:52:01 PDT
Reply-To:     Mark Dorm <mark_hb@hotmail.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Dorm <mark_hb@hotmail.com>
Subject:      Re: Engine Conversions for an '84
Comments: To: kmcdaniel@mercuryems.com
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Automatic is said to be stronger than the manual and can better take a stonger engine... - though I don't know if this true for all years... 80-83.5, 83.5-85, 86-91 - (I'm certain its true for the last set: 86-91)....

Isn't the lower end of the engine more expensive to have redone than the top end???

>From: Kelley McDaniel <kmcdaniel@mercuryems.com> > >I haven't been on this list for 5 years or so, since I sold my '81 (loved >it in spite of its underpowered "glass" engine, except for >the poor cabin heater). I was gonna scan the list for a few days before >writing, but I'm interested in this conversion thread. I'm >thinking about acquiring an '84 that was run out of oil. I want to learn >what's current regarding engine conversions. If I can do >a conversion with a strong reliable engine, I'll keep it. Otherwise, I'll >sell as is or repair the stock engine and sell it (since >it didn't die from the more normal electrolysis probs, I probably have good >heads, will need strong lower end). Also, I was partial >to the 4 speed and this one's automatic. I thought the auto was more >fragile. Is this so in the '84? > >Oh, and, I'll bite . . . what's a TiiCo? > >Thanks for any advice. > >Kelley in Kansas. > > > > Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:39:24 -0700 > > From: A & C Grobey <alien1@jps.net> > > Subject: Re: Engine Conversions > > > > My sister has now logged about 500 miles on her Tiico conversion and is > > loving it. I was very jealous of her today as I followed her on a >freeway > > onramp and up a long hill on the freeway. I could not keep up and I was >in > > my Ford Ranger with a 4 liter V6! I think she was showing off a little. > > > > Alan > > Sherwood, OR > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf >Of > > James Huskins > > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 5:54 AM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Engine Conversions > > > > Thanks to all who responded to my questions about Subaru vs. TiiCo > > conversions. I had been leaning toward Subaru, but here's my current > > thinking:

________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.