Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2000, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:39:28 -0500
Reply-To:     Chris Smith <chris.smith@aquila.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Chris Smith <chris.smith@aquila.com>
Subject:      Open Letter to GEX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Gentlemen, I've been the owner of 3 of your engines in the last 2 years. 2 were 1776 type 1 and one is a 2.0l type 4. The 1st 1776 broke a connecting rod with only 50 miles on the engine. It took the threat of several lawyers on the Vintage VW list to get you to replace the motor. The replacement broke another connecting rod 14 months later. Had I mistreated them, ran cheap oil, or neglected a single oil change, I might blame myself. But since they were taken well cared for, oil was changed at a maximum of 1643 miles once, the rest before 1500, and only Mobil One was used; the tune-ups were religious in nature; the revs were limited at 4300; the tin was tight; the car was never raced; and overall the engine was treated like a baby, I can only blame poor quality control. I make this claim not out of one experience with one type of motor, but out of experience with all 3 motors. Since the only warranty on 1776 engines is 12 months, I decided to accept defeat and go the long route of building my own engine. This has proven to take more time than I thought so it is going much slower than planned. The good part is that it is built correctly. I won't have to worry about what junk is thrown together in the engine. Hmm.. I wonder why it was easy for me to magnaflux the rods (all of them showed cracks, but the junk pile rods lying on my garage floor were good) and not you? this would have cost you a few dollars up front, but saved you a customer in the long run. Last night I needed to replace the heater boxes on the type 4 engine. This probably should have been done less than a year ago when the engine was installed, but that's another story. When I put the wrench to the nuts they turned quite easily. This I 1st thought was a good thing. Then, when the studs sheared off with little effort, I realized that it was going to be a long night. The good part is that the studs still had a couple of inches sticking out of the head. When I put Vice-Grips (tm) on the studs and tried to remove them, the sheared a 2nd time. This is the 1st time I've seen vice grips shear a stud. It seems that you guys decided to save money by using inferior studs, and to keep them from working out of the case you glued (ok, ok, "thread locked" them) into the heads. This is how a 1st year automotive student would attack the problem, not how a reputable engine builder operates. I've bought a fair number of engines over the last 20 years. Some were better than others. Mofoco is known for crap, but you came recommended by some reputable folks. They were wrong and are no longer recommending you. It's funny that with all the money you spend to promote your business, very little is spent on quality control or customer service. At least I have learned to treat your motors the same as a Mofoco motor. The type 1s make great bon-fires and the type 4s are best to slap in a vehicle right before I sell it overseas.

A former and now educated customer

Chris Smith


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.