Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2000, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 6 Sep 2000 06:18:41 -0700
Reply-To:     Ron Bloomquist <roadcow@MCN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Ron Bloomquist <roadcow@MCN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: PSA
Comments: To: Carlos Del Rio <cdelrio@concentric.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Carlos,

You wrote: "PSA has its uses, though several specialists' boards disagree on its usefulness.

More helpful is the Digital Rectal Exam (DRE), which, while uncomfortable, is preferred. The DRE gives the doctor information on size, shape, regularity, and consistency of the prostate,..."

--------<snip>-------------

The reason I mentioned PSA on the Vanagon list was to help encourage fellow Volks to be aware of Prostate Cancer and it was the PSA test indicated mine.

I did get eight p-mail replies from volks on the list who either already have it, think they might, or have friends who do. It's definitely out there and among us.

In my case the DRE indicated nothing. No lumps, bumps, irregularities. But the prostate biopsy I then had turned up six cancerous cores out of ten taken. My Gleason score was 4 + 4 = 8. (Scale 0 to 10)

Just like Vanagons there are many different thoughts and experiences concerning Prostate Cancer. None absolutely right or wrong. I only wanted to make folks aware. PSA, DRE, what-ever. Just do it and at least establish a base line.

I probably should have mentioned what finally caused me to go get a PSA in the first place. It was the fact that I could not get an erection and had not been able to since January of this year. Also I had been having urine problems, lack of pressure and a frequent urge which had been going on for three years! I ignored that because I thought I was just getting old.

Even my treatment, Orchiectomy, is controversial in that most men go for Hormone Therapy at my age. I chose Orchiectomy because of financial constraints and lack of health coverage. Orchiectomy (nut removal) is a one shot deal. I know it won't get rid of my cancer but hopefully it will slow it down. A friend of mine is taking the Hormone treatment; one estrogen shot every three months at a cost of $1,000 each shot! I could not afford that and keep tires on my Vanagon. (Vanagon content!)

Each case is different and.... aren't we all!!

Ron


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.