Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2000, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:50:36 -0700
Reply-To:     Steve Schwenk <steve@SYNCRO.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steve Schwenk <steve@SYNCRO.ORG>
Subject:      SUV Roll Overs = Death Patch
Comments: To: "syncro@egroups.com" <Syncro@egroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Some good info is coming out of the Firestone recall mess that has killed 88 in the us already. This info is pertinent because the vanagon is vulnerable to roll over due to its high center of gravity, the syncro more so...and syncros with taller springs/ride height, even more so. Roll overs more frequently involve fatalities than most accidents. Some of you may recall last year when a guy in a bus lost his entire family, although i don't recall whether that was a roll over or fire...caused by another driver, drunk i believe. Tires are a critical factor, as is tire pressure, in protecting yourself and family from roll overs. They typically happen due to blow outs or sudden, corrective action at higher speeds.

Here's parts of a piece in the NYT about the Explorer. Sorry about the downer nature of this: __________________________________________________________

But what has also emerged from Congressional testimony and recently released internal company documents is a picture of a tire, made according to Ford's design and marketing demands, that has often been run to its very limits. Indeed, in choosing those tires, Ford permitted a narrower margin of safety than in many other vehicles.

Not only does the combination of vehicle and tire push the limits on weight and speed. The Explorer itself, like many other sport utility vehicles with high centers of gravity, is prone to roll over despite what company documents show was an extensive but not entirely successful effort by Ford in 1989 to make the vehicle more stable. Taken together with the tire manufacturing problems and a variety of human factors — in essence, people tend to drive too fast and pay too little attention to the age or air pressure of their tires — the Explorer and the Firestone tires have proved a deadly pairing.

The demands that Ford placed on the tires reflect the difficult trade- offs the company faced in trying to turn the Explorer, essentially an off- road truck, into a more fashionable, refined vehicle that would feel like a car during high-speed driving. To give the Explorer a more comfortable ride and make it less likely to roll over in everyday driving, Ford chose a fairly low inflation pressure of 26 pounds a square inch. But at low pressures, tires cannot support as much weight and are more susceptible to coming apart at high speeds.

...

And even with the tire- related deaths, which have mostly occurred in rollovers, occupants of Ford Explorers still have lower overall death rates, and fewer deaths in rollovers, than occupants of other midsize sport utility vehicles.

It is possible, although hard to confirm, that in choosing a low pressure, Ford might have actually saved more lives than have been taken in tire-related crashes. Low- pressure tires reduce the risk of rollovers during sharp maneuvers. Even with the tire-related rollovers, the death rate in rollovers for Explorers is 42 percent lower than for its main rival, the Chevrolet Blazer, which uses a much higher-pressure tire but is also marketed to a younger audience that may take more risks while driving.

Then there is the question of weight. The Explorer's tires have less overall capacity to carry weight, in addition to the vehicle's own weight, than do the tires on most sport utilities. The Chevrolet Blazer uses the same size tires as the Explorer, for example, but because they are inflated to 35 pounds a square inch, they can carry 1,100 pounds more than the Explorer's tires. A Blazer typically weighs 100 to 200 pounds less than an Explorer, too.

A Firestone technical document, presented at a conference in 1998, shows that when the vehicle is carrying even a modest load, more of the weight is on the left rear tire than on any other tire — about 60 pounds more than on the right rear tire and 300 pounds more than the front tires.

Tom Baughman, Ford's engineering director for light trucks, said in an interview that the left rear tire was the most likely to fail, but added that weight did not appear to be the main reason for this. Ford has nonetheless decided in the last several weeks that the recommended pressure for tires on the company's completely redesigned 2002 Ford Explorer, scheduled to go on sale next January, will be at least 30 pounds for the front tires and 32 to 35 pounds for the rear tires, he said. A month ago, Ford officials had said that the pressure would be 30 pounds in the front and in the rear for the new Explorer.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.