Date:         Mon, 9 Oct 2000 21:32:06 -0700
Reply-To:     gerry rafferty <gerryr@DIRECT.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         gerry rafferty <gerryr@DIRECT.CA>
Subject:      Re: 83.5 underheating
Comments: To: Jim Arnott <jrasite@EONI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Jim
That's what my van would do,until on a rebuild I put in a higher rated
thermostat (87C I think).Pointer sits on the LED,van heats nicely- gets cold
here in Vancouver BC too
Gerry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Arnott" <jrasite@EONI.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 4:15 PM
Subject: 83.5 underheating


> Yup, you read it correctly.  Lisa's 83.5 is underheating.  It has a
> fresh radiator, a fresh tested thermostat and a fresh couple of
> gallons of Dex-cool and distilled water.  Sitting in the driveway
> idling, I can get the temp gauge up to the led after about a half hour
> of running.  On the road, it immediately drops right back into the box
> at the left side of the gauge.  Most of the time it's clear down on
> the peg.
>
> It's really running that cold as there is no heat at the front of the
> Van and minimal heat at the rear core.  If I still lived in SoCal, I'd
> be jumping for joy, but living here in eastern Oregon, heat is a
> precious commodity.  I'm open for suggestions...
>
> Jim Arnott
> WetWesties
> Union, OR
>