Date:         Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:23:44 -0600
Reply-To:     Darrell Boehler <midwesty@MIDWEST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Darrell Boehler <midwesty@MIDWEST.NET>
Subject:      Re: '84 Vanagon -- Thinking of buying
Comments: To: Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Karl,
    No one could have said it better.
Midwesty

> One other odd thing about the Vanagon design is that, if it speaks to you,
you will fall in love with it and no other vehicle will quite satisfy you
ever again.  Just like a beautiful but heartbreaking woman, you will lavish
your Vanagon with gifts, like water pumps and tranny mounts, and it will
repay you by leaving you high and dry, searching for another gift to please
her/it.  And you will simply obey, because you know that when she/it is
happy, you're getting the best you've ever had or ever will.
    Jon; if it feels right, go for it.  If not, run away.

> Karl Wolz

 ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Lee" <jrlee@MAILANDNEWS.COM>
> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 8:08 PM
> Subject: Re: '84 Vanagon -- Thinking of buying
>
>
> > Thanks to everyone for their advice.  I'm almost convinced not to buy
the
> > Vanagon, though I *REALLY* liked driving it. :-(  If it just weren't
going
> to
> > be my primary vehicle . . .  Maybe someday.
> >
> > Now, a new question.  What think 'ye of a '67 Beetle with a newish
engine
> > (20,000 miles on it)?  Any dire, eminent emergencies waiting to happen
> with
> > that one?  It'll be driven across the Bay Bridge 3 days a week if I buy
it
> .
> > . .
> >
> > (Sorry for the slightly off-topic question)
> >
> > best,
> > Jon
> > ---
> > Jonathan Rhodes Lee
> > jrlee@mailandnews.com
>