Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2000, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:48:54 -0700
Reply-To:     Larry Hamm <ldhamm@XMISSION.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Larry Hamm <ldhamm@XMISSION.COM>
Subject:      Re: types of fire extinguishing agents:
Comments: To: Bill Davidson <wdavidson@THEGRID.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Bill Davidson wrote: > > >From the West Marine Catalogue: (p.718 of 2000 master catalogue) > > "Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - good for Class B and Class C fires. No clean up. > Easy to use. Useful only in confined interior spaces. Does not cool fire. > > Halon - no longer produced as a result of the environmentally hazardous CFCs > (chloroflourocarbons) it produces. > > FE-241, FM-200 - relatively non-toxic Halon replacements are effective on > all fire classes. Not as effective as Halon. Expensive. [on page 719: > successors to Halon 1211 and 1301 which were effective, but too damaging to > the ozone layer. The FE-241 agent is for use only in unoccupied areas due to > its toxicity, but it is marginally more effective per pound than FM-200 and > has an ozone-depletion impact that is less than 1% of Halon 1211's. The > FM-200 agent is OK for occupied areas, but is slightly less effective and > inflicts no ozone depletion.] > > Halotron 1- Newly EPA approved. Safe for computers, electronics, even clean > rooms, and requires no cleanup after use. > > Dry Chemical - Low toxicity. Inexpensive. Effective on Class B and Class C > fires. Not effective on Class A fires. Difficult to clean up. > > Tri-Class Dry Chemical - low toxicity. Inexpensive. Effective on Class B and > Class C fires. Moderately effective on Class A fires. Difficult to clean up. > Corrosive. Not a good choice for helm or nav station. > > Aqueous Foam - this relatively new technology is extremely easy to use > effectively on Class A, B, and C fires. Avoid excessive skin or eye > contact." > > Anybody have experience or know anything about this Aqueous Foam stuff? > Clean up? > Bill, Good info. I don't know about aqueous foam, but check out the ballistic systems at:

http://www.primexfiresystems.com/applications.html

Sounds like they may be an excellent possibility, though pricey. Might even work in my plane. Larry


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.