Bill, True on the $200.00 not being worth going to court. BUT, the thief committed a crime. Two hundred, or two thousand, it was theft. Bill, if it were you or I, *we* would already be in jail and have to make bond. These scumbags walk all the time because nobody will go after them. They have become fearless. Its time we do something about these thieves. Has the victim forfeited his rights by making this deal to get back $210? Let's see, thief already had the converted property, our guy wasn't in much of a bargaining position. Our victim did not receive any consideration (in the legal sense) to make this new agreement legally binding and enforceable. Moreover, the subject matter of the "new agreement" was illegal; i.e., a theft. It is generally illegal in all states to make a civil agreement to gain leverage one way or another in a criminal matter. This is exactly what the thief did. To me it tends to show guilt. The agreement is null and void, and can be used as evidence against thief in criminal trial. I hope our victim vigorously pursues his rights with his local police. HK (this is purely off-the-cuff, and may not apply) but it probably is right on the money [text/html]
|
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.