Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2000, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:51:23 -0700
Reply-To:     Keith Adams <keith_adams@TRANSCANADA.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Keith Adams <keith_adams@TRANSCANADA.COM>
Organization: TransCanada
Subject:      Re: Stainless Steel Head Studs
Comments: To: Matthew Pollard <poll7356@UIDAHO.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

OK, Matt, now you've ticked me off... *kidding*

As a metallurgist, your statement is fraught with mis-truth.

Stainless steels, just like carbon steels, run the full gamut of strengths and hardnesses. Most stainless steels are in fact stronger than carbon steels and have a higher hardness. It's just their properties are much different. Ever tried to cut stainless steel with a hacksaw? It'll take a month of Sundays to get through it. Just different than carbon steels, that's all.

Examples: plain low carbon AISI 1020 Carbon steel - UTS 55 ksi, YS 30 ksi, EL 25% high strength low alloy (HSLA) AISI 633 Grade E2 - UTS 75 ksi, YS 55 ksi, EL 23% plain carbon, quench and tempered (Q&T) AISI 1080 - UTS 116-190 ksi, YS 70-142 ksi, EL 13-24% alloy steel, Q&T AISI 4340 - UTS 142-284 ksi, YS -130-228 ksi, EL 11-21%

Stainless ferritic AISI 409 - UTS 65 ksi, YS - 35 ksi, EL 25% austenitic AISI 316L - UTS 80 ksi, YS - 35 ksi, EL 50% martensitic AISI 410 - UTS 70 ksi, YS - 40 ksi, EL 30% precipitation hardenable AISI 17-7PH - UTS 130 ksi, YS - 40 ksi, EL 35% above is solution treated AISI 17-7PH - UTS 215 ksi, YS 195 ksi, EL 9%

where: UTS = ulitmate tensile strength YS = yield strength (onset of plastic deformation) EL = elongation in 2" gauge length

Hardness correlates with yield strength (hardness is merely a yield strength test in a localized and microscopic fashion). The higher the yield strength, the higher the hardness.

Now, I don't see anything in those numbers which explain that stainless is any worse than carbon steel. It's just that since stainless is more expensive, people tend to "cheap out" and get the lowest grade, rather than the grade that is suitable. As noted above with the hacksaw example, stainless is very tedious to machine (I also used to work as a machinist) so tooling costs go up, and so does the time per part. Also more tedious to weld. Stainless steels are more complicated than carbon steels for many reasons. For this reason, they are rather misunderstood.

Keith Adams Metallurgical Engineer Calgary, Alberta, Canada 1986 Vanagon GL Westfalia "Roxy"

Matthew Pollard wrote:

> Hey- wait a second here. Stainless is not as strong as steel! That is why you can't use stainless fastners when you build a house (but ok for the top of decks or fence boards). I would stick with what VW tested > and knows about. The use of stainless is apealing but is actually a fairly weak and soft metal. > Cheers > Matthew


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.