Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2001, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:08:23 +1200
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: Swaybars-worth it(rear)?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

When you add a rear anti-sway bar, you are moving the "roll >couple" or roll resistance more to the rear of the vehicle. This means that >the rear of your Vanagon is now doing more of the work in holding the van to >the road as you round the corner. This is why anti roll bars are more >fun...right to the point where the tires let go. Since you are asking the >question, it says to me that you have an interest in this and may know all >about this stuff. Don't let this talk you out of it, just know that it will >change the dynamics of your Vanagon.

Swaybars can actually cause UNDERsteer, as happened with a hot Corolla hatch marketed in Australia some years ago. It had fat swaybars front & rear. Roadtesters hated it because it was no fun to drive, pushing its nose wide in bends. The introduction of front swaybars to the Split vans produced mild understeer. I'm not sure about the effects of rear bars; I expect much of the understeer may be caused by the front.

>Don't go burning too fast into a tight >corner (in a Vanagon? You crazy man?) get spooked and lift off the throttle. >Or if you do, be prepared to watch where you are going through the side >window!

The Vanagon has a reputation for hunting BMWs etc on twisty German backroads. VW should have marketed it as a sportsvan. Don't knock its handling (nonNorth American versions anyway). Any Transporter van built after the changeover to CV joints (ie postmid67) and not converted into a camper is capable of being driven very hard on twisties. The only time I got a fright in my 75 1800 was on a very narrow country road, entering an off-camber righthander way too fast. It began to understeer and I thought I was going to run off nose-first and see how it handled a high-speed (say 75mph) jump down about 7 feet into a plowed field. But just in time the rear end let in a little oversteer and corrected the situation. I think this oversteer was caused by the off-camber, because it was not a normal handling characteristic to that vehicle.

Well, the Vanagon is supposed to handle better than the Bay. Though mine understeered badly (but could snap the tail out in the wet, partly due to the heavy iron 174hp V6), understeery enough to be no fun in the twisties.

Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand VW & mollusc nut 1984 VW Caravelle (currently SVX engine; waiting for a Porsche trans) 1985 Mitsubishi Galant Sigma 2.0 (FWD), for sale 1986 CE80 Toyota Corolla 1.8DX diesel (extaxi) 1989 CE96 Toyota Corolla 1.8DX diesel wagon 1989 CT170 Toyota Corona Select 2.0 diesel (taxi)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.