Date:         Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:46:00 -0800
Reply-To:     mark lortie <mlortie@UCSD.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mark lortie <mlortie@UCSD.EDU>
Subject:      Re: [Syncro] Heavy Duty Rear Axels/CVs (108mm), Factory
Comments: To: Derek Drew <derekdrew@rcn.com>
Comments: cc: Syncro@egroups.com, Chris Weddle <info@2weddle.com>,
          euromog@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I used to have a couple of old land rovers & the rear axles broke once in a while but it
wasnt a big thing cause you could slip them out through the wheel hub & use 2WD  to limp
home (wouldnt work in a syncro) . At first I thought it was another legendary english design
problem but upon reflection I realized  it was an inexpensive weak link in my drive train &
fixable in the field (I tried welding a few ... didnt last ).  Bottom line it saved my
tranny when working in low gear ratios . You may ask yourself what  you prefer to save .. A
syncro axle or a tranny .

On the positive side . .. The land rover axles are encased & protected . The syncro axles
are not and I can easily see a shaf getting bent in the field by dropping onto a rock so a
heavy duty shaft could be of benefit .

another $0.02 for the pot

--
Mark J Lortie PhD
Division of Nephrology & Hypertension
UCSD School of Medicine
La Jolla CA.
858-552-8585 x 7139