Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2001, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 6 Jan 2001 20:03:24 -0800
Reply-To:     The Skylight Guy <reid@DCCNET.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         The Skylight Guy <reid@DCCNET.COM>
Organization: @Home Network
Subject:      Re: Vendors and shipping
Comments: To: JKrevnov@AOL.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Rich:

Lucky you- you see I have only sent about 30 packages UPS, then I decided to stop. They have lost things, delivered them to the wrong addresses, and broke things. One or two packages made it safely and on time to their intended destination. This is not a gross exaggeration. As you can see by the other e-mails and as Bill and Juli and John pointed out- I'm not the only one.

Rich, the online advice you give is always so good, however, you've got one thing wrong. I'm not missing something. Are you attempting to flame me? Or are you "just kidding" <g>? Or are you genuinely trying to help me? Sometimes, the impersonal nature of email makes it difficult to ascertain the sender's intent of the message...so I'm interested to know what gain I will receive by you saying I'm really missing something to the entire group? Also, the maxims at the end of the message... I assume you are trying to help me. If so, re-read what I wrote...I wrap my products really well - according to how UPS suggested in fact (again no hyperbole here). My point is what Bill summarized from the consumer reports- the US / Canadian postal service may be a little slower (a day or two) but it is cheaper, there is no hassle, and it arrives in one piece (the majority of the time...no place is perfect). We all should be able to voice what has happened and then we can read it and make informed choices about what services we choose. The online community needs newsgroups so we can stay well informed of all business practices, esp. with online vending because it is still relatively in its infancy. Sure there is the BBB and consumer reports, etc, but sometimes it takes a long time for certain issues to surface. Sometimes, if an injustice is happening to one person, it happening to a few. Soon the few become a sizable group. If it is the odd case where this is not the case, like me and UPS, thems the breaks (forgive the pun). People think that stuff like that will never happen to them. Well, when it does, it's shattering (oops, I did it again). Obviously UPS is a big company and is not breaking everyone's stuff 95% of the time or they wouldn't be in business. They just won't get my business...and they told me that they are ok with that too.

Granted, it is bizarre. Sometimes it is just a coincidence that a person has bad luck so many times in a row. Like buying a Westy and having the heads go, then the fridge, then the brakes, then the....hey! We might all might have something missing! <g>

It seems you have had good luck..less than 1 item was broken out of a thousand in 20 years (you're not counting your package damaged by UPS from the Crate and Barrel :) ...If I had those odds with UPS, I'd probably send stuff via UPS too. Thanks for sharing your stats: a sample size of a 1000 over 20 years is better than a sample size of 30 over a year. I hope I haven't jinxed ya. For now, I'll stick with USPS and the Canadian Postal Service.

Peace!

Trevor Reid

T H E S K Y L I G H T G U Y est.1997 RR6 1501 Smith Road, Gibsons, B.C. zzzzzz\zzzzz_ Canada V0N 1V6 Ph 604 886-4564 |E[__][__]|[_]\\ e-mail: skylight@dccnet.com |skylight | guy|| ............................................ =-(o)------(o)-== http://www.theskylightguy.com

Rico Sapolich wrote: > > In a message dated 1/6/01 3:47:56 AM, reid@DCCNET.COM writes: > > << I definitely won't use UPS because they will arrive broken at > least 95% of the time- no matter how well I wrap them >> > > Trevor, > > Either this is hyperbole or else you are really missing something. Without > exaggeration, over the past 20 years I have received certainly more than a > thousand packages via mail order. They have been all manner of things and > the bulk of them have arrived by way of UPS. Some of the items, once again > without exaggeration, were precision instruments insured for $10K-$30K and > shipped via UPS. In all that time, I am hard pressed to enumerate the > instances of shipping damage at the hands of UPS. If I were to characterize > it, I would have to say damage occurred less than 0.1% of the time. > > Also, I live in PA (aka, God's Country) and I have shipped some rather > ungainly items to members of this list as far away as Hawaii. I imagined > what these items would have to endure en route and I took the necessary steps > to insure against any shipping damage. > > So, don't kill the messenger because of the message . . . a problem > recognized is a problem solved . . . an ounce of prevention is worth a pound > of cure . . . or any other maxim that applies. > > Rich

--


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.