Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2001, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:41:54 -0800
Reply-To:     Daniel Schmitz <djs@GENE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Daniel Schmitz <djs@GENE.COM>
Organization: Genentech, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Wasserboxer and Porsche 914?
Comments: To: John Schaper <JSchaper@SCHSA.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

John,

As an owner of approximately this combination of vehicles ('87 Westfalia, '75 914), I offer the following advice:

I have to echo what a previous poster said in response to your post. Unless the '71 is pristine, $3K is a lot to spend. There are better years to consider for this car. The '71 had a lousy shifting mechanism (fixed in '73) and a passenger seat that is not adjustable for travel, among other design defects.

The Porsche 914, while arguably more fun to drive, is no replacement for the utility and practicality of a Bus or Vanagon. If you can only have one car, I would have to side with practicality on this one. It's simply not the same experience to camp out in a 914 as in a bus or Vanagon :) Nor can you haul copious amounts of stuff around in one.

If you are buying a 4-cylinder (I assume it's not a six for that price), most likely it's still a 1.7L if it hasn't been modified. But many people installed "big-bore" kits on these, and they can make the engine short-lived.

You should avoid cars that have carbs installed to replace the original D-Jetronic fuel injection. D-Jetronic FI is excellent for these cars, both in it's simplicity and driveability. Unfortunately, many owners replaced it with dual carbs, which is never a good idea for a stock engine.

Things to inspect closely: Rust occurs like cancer on poorly maintained cars. Most notably, underneath the battery tray and, if long neglected, the rear suspension console. If you find significant rust or cancer in these areas, you should probably walk away!

Like Kyle, I would look for a good to excellent example of a '73 or '74 2.0. With these cars, you should do your research and pay as much as you can afford for a good example. It's not worth spending less for a "project" car. The cost to resurrect the 914 is not inexpensive.

Dan

John Schaper wrote: > > Can the erudite members of the list help me with a dilemma. Been a member > of the list and a '85 GL owner for 3 years and love both. Now I have an > opportunity to buy a "good condition" '71 Porsche 914 for around $3,000. Do > I follow my emotions and go for it, or look at something more practical. > After all, the '71 is 30 years old!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.