Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2001, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:33:56 EST
Reply-To:     Wolfvan88@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Lilley <Wolfvan88@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: 2.1L Oil pressure problem: Rods: SYMPTOM NOT CAUSE:UNBALANCED
              crank the ....
Comments: To: NotaJeep@aol.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

<<<Most people SHOULD keep the WBX engine but you are doing a disservice to them by telling them the counterweighted crank will keep it from throwing rods..>>>

All I am doing is passing on the information that I have learned from others that have been there and discovered better ways to do things than "factory."

Have you been to the Gene Berg Enterprises web and looked at the technical information there?

http://www.geneberg.com/ http://www.geneberg.com/crankshaft.htm

How much do you know about the T1 T4 engines, the problems that developed and the way the VW engineers fixed a problem only to create another problem? And the way after market solved problems VW created (some are junk but there are good items out there)

One: The 8 mm head studs were constantly pulling from the case. VW came up with 10 mm studs and case savers: Bigger threads in the case problem solved...well the studs started breaking in half... They then went to 10 mm ends and 8 mm shafts...No more breaking or pulling out studs. The 10 mm studs did not grow with engine and were over stressed and broke. There are bigger head studs for the WBX, but I think that they will create the same problem that VW faced when they tried that.

The rod breakage can be attributed to the longer stroke on a un-counterweighted crank according to many.

It is NOT MY idea, BUT others before me that researched this and discovered it. VW wants to make a car last only so long, so you will have to buy a new car or part...

I heard about a tire company that made a tire so good, that they soon went out of business because they had no repeat business...

<<<No..sorry I'm in a manufacturing envrioment here and if you change the crank, rods pistons as they did with the 2.1 it would NOT have cost ANY MORE to have made a 2.5..>>>

New crank molds, more material, redesign needed, etc., would be needed, VW was working on a 3.2L flat 6, but they moved to the Eurovan and front wheel drive before it was released (all in past post to the list...).

You can buy the 3.2L in Germany today IF you have enough money.


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.