Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2001, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:47:49 -0800
Reply-To:     Leon Korkin <korkwood@SURFREE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Leon Korkin <korkwood@SURFREE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Subaru conversion
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2

David Marshall wrote:

> I think Chris Stann has my feelings at heart too! Keep it a Volkswagen, or > at the least keep it German with an Audi engine.

David, It appears you are suggesting that in our modern world there is advantage to keeping vehicles all-german or all-american, or all-japanese at any cost? American classic Harley-Davidson should get rid of their parts made in Japan? Are we making desisions using our heart feelings only? Volkswagen quality and technology in Vanagon was way behind other european and japanese brands. After so many blunders they finaly got their act together and make competitive cars. When we make decisions about what parts to put in our Vanagon we need to use our brains and what's the best to keep it running. Those who are "purists" will stay in slow lane with original engine. Those who have Subaru engine will be staying with traffic, moving at an average 80mph now days and passing when needed. Why bother with gaining mere 10-15 hp when you can have extra 40! It is worth extra effort! I may ruffle some feathers but prefer to be realistic Leon 85 Subwagen Westy

> > > I have not personally installed a Subaru engine but I have a fair idea what > is required. I feel the I4 engines are simpler to install especially if you > get someone [like us] to do the wiring harness for you - both KEPs and Fast > Forward's kits require minor fabrication of some parts - it takes a little > thinking for installing both. BOTH conversions have their pluses and > minuses. I openly state that I am biased towards the I4 conversions, this > is what I do during my evenings and weekends! I am sure by the end of the > day you will see arguments for both. > > If you have any questions about I4 conversions please let me know, I will > try my best to assist you. > > David Marshall > > Fast Forward Autobahn Sport Tuning > 4356 Quesnel Hixon Road > Quesnel BC Canada V2J 6Z3 > mailto:info@fastforward.ca http://www.fastforward.ca > Phone: (250) 992 7775 FAX: (250) 992 1160 > > • Vanagon Accessories and Engine Conversions > • Transporter, Unimog and Iltis Sales > • European Lighting for most Audi and Volkswagen models > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf > Of dawn > Sent: March 28, 2001 9:41 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: subaru conversion > > Is the subaru conversion easier than the i-4 conversion? I can get a > legacy motor for 375.00 > Darrel 88


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.