Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2001, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:22:35 -0600
Reply-To:     CTONLINE@WEBTV.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Terry Kay <CTONLINE@WEBTV.NET>
Subject:      Re: Simpler Alternative to welding body panels
Comments: To: Wade Ebert <monster51@springnet1.com>
In-Reply-To:  "Wade Ebert" <monster51@springnet1.com>'s message of Thu, 29 Mar
              2001 08:54:07 -0600
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Wade, I read your posting. There was no way I was attempting to implicate the re-engineering of the automobile. What I was simply stating, was, there is new technology that CAN replace the old, phreistoric techniques, and these proceedures could be implimented here in Vanagonland, wih no consequence. They idea you were coveying was you welded all your repairs, in leu of using the panel adhesive, thats what I got out of it anyway. And I chuckled, because there is no way this could ever happen in this new world of automobile technology of paper thin sheet metal. Yor not dealing with 49 Ford's any longer. You would be straightening more twisted new metal, than the original repair. And you did state in your posting you welded All your repairs. You just didn't say how much you welded.

No, I do condone the junk-yard, cave and pave, patch panel techniques that some body shops use, and I never have or will use them.

I am in a different ball game than you are. My shop is in the class 8 truck repair buisness, and I specialize in the repair of Mack Trucks. And I have found several applications, where the 3-m body panel adhesives, are a better solution to the ultimate repair.

I don't have the problems that you guy's in the automotive, end of it have. No air bags, no convoluting panels,--but, everthing is built heavy, and experiances one hell of beating in its lifetime, much more than a Geo Prism, or a Keo.

I have never had one failure attributed to the use of 3-M's product--period.

And I believe that this new technology can be applied to a Vanagon with no ill effects.

This is in my professional honest opinion.

Later,

______________ |[ ] [ ] [ ]\ | | | | ||-(())----(())-|

Terry 85 GL


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.