Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2001, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:55:28 -0400
Reply-To:     Walt Spak <wnsopc3@3RDM.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Walt Spak <wnsopc3@3RDM.NET>
Subject:      Temperature guage
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

List,

I thought I ought to put my 2 cents in about the temp gauge situation. I installed a Boston Bob rebuilt engine in my 91 GL last spring. At the same time, I replaced both of the temp sensors in the thermostat housing and the fan switch in the radiator (along with just about everything else).

I was planning to install an 87 degree thermostat, but Bob insisted that I should use an 80 degree. With the 80 degree, the temp gauge came only about half way up to the light, even during 90 degree weather. The fan would cycle on low speed when I was at a stop light or in traffic, but the gauge would still not go much above the 1/2 way point to the light (1/4 up the gauge). I ran the bus this way through Dec. when I started to notice that my heater was not sufficient with the colder weather. I then installed the 87 degree thermostat. The temp gauge immediately went to the normal position of just covering the lower half of the light. It was 80 degrees out side yesterday and the temp gauge stays in the normal position, except that at traffic lights when it climbs slightly to cover the upper portion of the light. The fan continues to cycle when I am idling just like it did with the cooler thermostat.

I was surprised by this because I expected the fan to run considerably more frequently with the higher thermostat. So, the engine is defiantly running hotter, but the fan does not cycle any more often. I really can not explain this situation. Can anyone else?

Boston Bob's theory was to keep the engine as cool as possible, particularly in the summer. With all due respect, I am disagreeing and here is why. I was pulling a steady 20 MPG with the old engine (87 degree thermostat). The new engine gave me only 18 MPG. I attributed this to the engine being tight, but I had already put 20,000 miles on it by Dec.. When I switched back to the 87 degree thermostat, the gas mileage jumped right back up to 20. This leads me to believe that the engine runs more efficiently at 87 degrees.

Comments?

Walt Spak Pittsburgh, PA. wnsopc3@3rdm.net


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.