Date:         Thu, 26 Apr 2001 06:18:50 -0500
Reply-To:     CTONLINE@webtv.net
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Terry Kay <CTONLINE@webtv.net>
Subject:      Re: Brighter tail lamps
Comments: To: Nigel Bennett <NigelB@foschini.co.za>
In-Reply-To:  Nigel Bennett <NigelB@foschini.co.za>'s message of Thu, 26 Apr
              2001 12:02:52 +0200
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Nigel,
Quite frankly, I was tired of being one of those obscured cars in an
adjacent lane with dangerously dim tailights.

At one point I was considering, placing a white reflective sign across
the back of my rear hatch stating; CAUTION THIS VEHICLE IS POWERED BY
THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS!!

I think VW must have studied Joe Lucas's
electrical systems very closely, and copied him to a T.

I feel that the stock tailights are way below safe standards.

And, because they are so low to the ground, they cause absolutely no
dangerous glare, or blinding light to other motorist's, as reported by
an inquiring fellow Vanogonite, who followed me for 3 miles, to find out
how to acquire the same effect on the rear of his van.

I feel so much better about being able to be seen,rather tan smacked by
the flying fools here in the Chicago area, after dark.

Later,

  ______________
 |[  ] [  ] [ ]\
 |    |    |    |
||-(())----(())-|

Terry 85 GL