Date:         Sun, 6 May 2001 10:27:47 -0700
Reply-To:     radish150 <radish150@earthlink.net>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         radish150 <radish150@earthlink.net>
Subject:      hydrogen
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
              x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"

> Date:    Sun, 6 May 2001 09:46:55 -0500
> From:    Dave Baker
> Subject: Re: I thought I said Synergy
>
> I disagree.  In the year 2050, the major source of fuel will be hydrogen.
>




Well, I certainly would be pleased with this, but from what I have seen, at the rate that this world evolves we will still be savaging the last un touched
reserves of oil while we choke to death just to keep the decendants of the bush clan happy. then again, we may go back to coal fired steam.

In Oregon I saw a lawn mower and several other engines run on hydrogen, I'm still alive. I think that hindenburg thing was arson by oil interests (ok, prolly
not).

Personaly, I say we start by putting all our teevee's together into a big pile and BURN them to harness the thermal energy.

mark...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>