Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2001, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 12 May 2001 18:11:44 +1200
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
Subject:      Re: is your Vanagon your main/only vehicle?
Comments: To: Jennifer <ncc876@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>The Caravelle *is* a Vanagon/Transporter. Generation 3.

Hmmm... perhaps better to say the *Vanagon* is a Caravelle by a different name, as Caravelle was the home-market (original) name, and also used in most of the world.

>We also have the RL and TL models here under the Acura name; I tried >one of the larger 4.2 (I think that's the number) sedans at an auto >show once, and if it's ever sold as a wagon and I have the money, I >would consider it (but probably get a German car first.) Do those >exist over there?

Not as far as I'm aware, even under a totally different name. i think the Legend and NSX are the biggest Hondas sold here. The Honda-badged diesel Isuzu Frontera SUV doesn't count!

>I think the Quantum also later became the Passat.

I believe the Santana/Quantum was basically an Audi 90, which was the 5-cylinder version of the Audi 80. The early Passat was in fact just a VW-badged Audi 80/Fox, though the fastback/liftbacks were only sold with VW badges and the notchbach as an Audi; wagons wore both badges. Way to distinguish an older VW-badged Audi: if engine is transverse it's a true VW. If it's IRS it's VW. If engine is inline it's an Audi; if rear beam axle, again, Audi. In the most recent models the distinction may have begun to blur...

>The Chevy Nova wasn't a direct lookalike to the Corolla, though it >closely resembled the Corolla hatchback model that it was based on. >The bodywork was a little bit different, and I do think the interior >was slightly different as well. I know that the steering wheel looked >a bit different to me when I looked into the window of a Nova once. A >variant of the current Corolla is now sold as the Chevy storm, though >it's a sedan now instead of a hatchback, since the Corolla wagon is >no longer sold (nor is the Camry wagon).

I drove a 1986 liftback "Nova" for 4 months in Newfoundland. My wife now has a diesel CE80 sedan of same age. There were 2 different instrument cowls available for the AE/CE80 Corollas (1984-1988), but the crashpad and instruments themselves were identical. There were a number of different steeringwheels available. Looking at a photo of the Nova now, I can see that it was the Corolla sold in the Japanese market as Sprinter, which had the side creases in different places, and different grill. However it was otherwise identical to the normal Corolla-badged cars. Even doors should be interchangable, though the creases won't match up. The 89-92 AE/CE90 Sprinter sedan was sold in USA as Geo Storm; these had different front lights and fenders and different (sort-of spoilered) trunklid/fenders to the normal Corolla, otherwise identical. The 90-series Corolla Liftback (sold in Japan as Ceilo) had the Sprinter front end; the 90-series 4WD Sprinter Carib wagon I think was sold as Corolla over there; the older 80-series angular Carib was sold for some reason as a Tercel (which it most certainly was not; the Corolla II/Corsa/Tercel was a considerably smaller car than the Corolla, and the 4WD "Tercel" was actually a Corolla/Sprinter).

>>very few Vanagon badges did sneak onto vehicles in other markets eg >>Australia. > >Maybe, maybe not. I sent a note to a friend of mine in Australia and >got a text-based blank stare in reply. Either he does not know the >older VW model lineup or he just doesn't know the US name. I recall >mentioning the Transporter to him once in the past and he did know of >it at that time. Hopefully another Australian can clear this up...

One Aussie listee some time ago was definite that a few were sold there as Vanagons, and his was a factory Vanagon. I'd said on the list what you're saying now, and his response was quite emphatic.

>I thank you for agreeing with me that the Eurovan could use some >restyling work rather badly. :)

It's not fit to be called a Transporter! No room for a start, which problem it shares with all front-engined SWB/MWB vans: put 2 rows of seats in the back and there's NO room for luggage or groceries behind them. Gimme a nice forward-control/cabover T1-T3 or KZH100 Hiace anyday!! Or maybe an Estima (=Previa) egg.

Regards Andrew


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.