Date:         Wed, 30 May 2001 15:55:46 -0700
Reply-To:     Larry Hamm <ldhamm@XMISSION.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Larry Hamm <ldhamm@XMISSION.COM>
Subject:      Re: what the vw waterboxer offers?? wasRe: 85 Westfalia beeping
Comments: To: Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Chris Stann wrote:

But, before I go, here's a quote from a

> Subaru-conversion owner:
>
> "Subaru engines are OK, but they are afflicted with similar head gasket
> problems and are expensive to fix. They also have 2 count em 2 timing belts
> that have to be replaced at about 60,000 miles, again not cheap. The belts
> are also known to fail before their time. I know I own a Subaru now with
> 206,000 miles and the head gaskets went the second time. I also have a 1990
> Vanagon GL with 160,000 miles only one head gasket failure so far. NO
> STINKING TIMING BELTS EITHER."

There is no known head gasket problem with the Legacy engine, as there is with
the wasserboxer. My Legacy engine, which most convertors are using, has one,
count it, ONE belt, cost me $34.95 for a new one. A timing belt is normally an
indication of a more efficient engine. (OHC)
I'm guessing that your guy is talking about the older engines, which do have two
belts, but I only know of one or two conversions with them. They came out in
'82, and most people want to upgrade to a modern engine when they swap.
If you want a VW engine in your van, by all means, have one. I've had the 2.1,
the diesel, and a 1.8 Jetta, and don't care for any of them, although the I4's
are pretty bulletproof. But don't knock those of us who want dependability,
power, and low cost.
Larry
'82 Syncronized Subaru/Westy