At 10:02 AM 6/19/01 -0500, Larry Alofs wrote: >Disappointed you feel that way Tom. >The warnings seemed more than adequate. Tom's right. There's nothing that will bring a website into disrepute quicker than porn. The people approving will never notice the difference, but those who don't like it will simply unsubscribe and drift away unnoticed. It won't be long before the things turns into a locker room of good ol' boys, and the original value is lost. This is a great website and benefits from a large discussion group with a huge amount of experience. Let's not wreck it. There's enough porn elsewhere. We don't need it here, too. Charles '85 Westy |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.