Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2001, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:16:57 -0700
Reply-To:     Charles McGehee <chasm@ELLTEL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Charles McGehee <chasm@ELLTEL.NET>
Subject:      Re: ?? SA Engine Conversion ??
In-Reply-To:  <001301c0f5c5$e011cfc0$947c1a41@kc.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Right. In fact it was just that logic that governed Detroit in the 1950's with their "planned obsolescence" when the idea was that you would drive a car for two years and throw it away. Fortunately the Germans and Japanese didn't buy that and forced Detroit to make better cars, but only after many painful years.

As it is, if it weren't for federal law which requires spare parts be sold for 10 years (I think it's 10) manufacturers wouldn't keep parts alive for more than a couple of years.

By the way, the story of the Eurovan that Ari Ollikainen put us onto was interesting. The T2 was introduced in 1967 and had its best year in 1971 just four years later. After that it was downhill all the way to 1978. Every year a successful car is produced and remains on the road makes it harder to sell the same car in the future. In that regard the Vanagon was its own worst enemy just as the Beetle was its own. I'd like to see similar stats for the Vanagon and the Eurovan. You can bet that VW has been tracking such stats closely.

Charles '85 Westy

At 01:06 PM 6/15/01 -0500, Dave Baker wrote: >Yes, but keep in mind that every car maker's dream is to have everyone buy >their cars, then junk them after a couple of years. Isn't there more money >to be made from selling new models than keeping the old ones alive? > >Dave in KC >85 Westy >http://members.fortunecity.com/davebaker1 > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Terry Kay <CTONLINE@WEBTV.NET> >To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:35 AM >Subject: Re: ?? SA Engine Conversion ?? > > > > So in essence what you are implicating, is that as soon as VW introduces > > the new Micro bus, the Eurovan is going to be dead issue? > > > > I have a real hard time believing that. > > > > And I don't think that there were enough Vanagons sold here, or still is > > enough to jeopardize their current vehicle sales, in offering an engine > > conversion kit. > > > > ______________ > > |[ ] [ ] [ ]\ > > | | | | > > ||-(())----(())-| > > > > > > Terry > > 74 Campmobile (Clementine) > > 85 GL > > 86 BMW 325 ES


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.