Bill N wrote: > So why do we torque metric bolts to ft. lb. specs? Why not to kilo newtons? > Torque is expressed in units of force multiplied by distance. (The distance being the length of the lever arm.) In some cases( as on my cheapo torque wrench from Harbor Freight) the "metric" approach results in torque specs given in meter-kilograms. This is not really correct because the kilogram is unit of mass, not force. Of course under normal gravity 1 kg has a weight of 2.2 lb (or in metric units, 9.8 Newtons), so the force implied is actually equal to the weight of a kg. Since the correct metric unit of force in the Newton, torque (in metric units) should be written in Newton-meters ( N-m). This is the approach used by physicists tho probably not yet by automotive engineers in the U.S. In my Bentley (thru '91) I find torque specifications given in Nm and well as ft-lb. OK, more than you wanted to know. Sometimes we physics teachers just can't help ourselves. Larry A. Chicago |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.