Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:09:52 -0500
Reply-To: wilden1@JUNO.COM
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
Subject: Re: Engine conversions and such...
Content-Type: text/plain
A friend of mine was collecting big GM and Ford cars and restoring them
with just basic cosmetic restorations.
I told him to watch television and see which cars they were wrecking in
the police chases in the movies and avoid buying those types of cars.
I think the same rule probably applies now.
Stan Wilder
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:39:24 -0400 Jay L Snyder
<Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM> writes:
> Excellent point. How many '85 Caravans are still out there as
> everyday
> driver's? If you see one, there is usually a large cloud of blue
> smoke
> coming from the tailpipe. They will not be collectible!
>
>
>
>
> Kitzmann <kitzmann@EXIS.NET> on 06/28/2001 09:15:01 AM
>
> Please respond to Kitzmann <kitzmann@EXIS.NET>
>
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> cc: (bcc: Jay L Snyder/AE/DuPont)
> Subject: Re: Engine conversions and such...
>
>
>
>
> Oh I forgot one little thing, if they do become collectable most
> restorers
> have to bring things back to stock for most vehicles. People mess
> around
> with there cars all the time, just look at some of the old Beatles
> or
> Busses, bored out engines, little gagets added or removed, nonstock
> interiors, etc.... In all reality even if the Bus has an engine
> conversion many restorers will still want the body if it is in great
> shape
> to restore back to original. If I was going to restore an older Bus
> I
> would definitely take a rust free nonorignal, say with a bigger
> motor with
> dual carbs, then an original with rust and other problems. So all
> this
> complaining back and forth is really pointless. What matters is
> that we
> like are Vans and are keeping them running in some fashion. Oh, and
> about
> reliability, I don't think any of the vans from the 80's where that
> reliable. I've know a lot of people with Caravans and the like that
> have
> sunk much more money into thier vans then I have. Example 4 engines
> in 10
> yrs for a Caravan! Two different people I know had to return thier
> Caravans to the dealers after 6-9 months for a replacement because
> the
> originals where such S#@&. Better proof of reliability was a long
> term
> reliability test that I saw a while back of the vans sold in 1989
> the top
> two for reliability where, suprise, the Vanagon and MPV. They all
> had
> problems, Chrysler just did a better job at selling to the
> unsuspecting
> public.
> Dave K.
> 178000 miles on 2 engines 82 diesel now 1.8L gas
> Friends Caravan 145000 miles 4 engines, and currently no AC or power
> windows and it is hot!
> Which is better?
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
| 
