Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2001, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:10:58 -0400
Reply-To:     Bill Harris <biharris@CASAGRANDE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Bill Harris <biharris@CASAGRANDE.COM>
Subject:      Re: do we have a vacuum leak?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Sometimes it helps to see if the idle smooths out by stifling the air intake a bit (a hand covering it partially should do the trick). This usually indicates a vacuum leak and could save a wild goose chase if it's something else...

bill

----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott G. Terry" <sgterry@ENGINEERING.UCSB.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:18 PM Subject: do we have a vacuum leak?

> Hi Michael, > > Thanks for responding to my post. I'll be interested to read your results. > Please carbon-copy me when you post them to the list. I subscribe in > digest-mode and don't always have time to keep up with the traffic. > > Pearl is fluctuating rapidly between 7-9" vacuum at idle so I think by > anybody's standard I do have a leak. Lucky me! > I think I can hear a leak but I can't get the engine to race when I hose > suspect areas with carb cleaner (not the safest approach, use cat. > converter safe brand, etc. etc.). Maybe a worn valve train... maybe I'm > just hearing induction noise... > this is where experience (which I lack) would really help. > > So is 10-12 " indicative of a healthy vacuum or a leaky vacuum? I believe > the question remains unanswered. My conclusion from my test was manifold > vacuum should be 15". Yet no one has stepped up to the plate and said > they're getting 15" in their wasserboxer. Matthew Pollard is getting > awesome gas mileage in his 1.9L(?) and I think I remember that he brought > his fuel pressure into spec with a new FPR, so this would imply his engine > has good manifold vacuum. So, Matthew, how about borrowing a vacuum gauge > from UI and measuring your manifold vacuum at idle (and maybe 2000 rpm > while you're at it)? We would make you second author if we publish the > findings in the Journal of Vanagon Vacuum (J. Van. Vac.). First author if > you also do some NMR on the head gasket adhesive and solve the riddle of > the water leak. > > Scott Terry > '85 Westy "Pearl" > Santa Barbara, CA > > >While attempting to evacuate my AC system, I noticed the MV as 10" to 12" > >Hg just as you state. Do you think I have a leak somewhere -- I hadn't > >thought that it might should be 15". > > > >Thanks, > >Michael Townsend > >90 Carat > >Durham NC > > > >PS. Finally got my R-134a charged this morning -- looking forward to a > >cool drive home! >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.