Date:         Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:30:55 +1200
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: Sort of a conversion thing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>In a message dated 8/23/01 2:00:12 AM, alizar@MOSQUITONET.COM writes:
>
><< the Golf . . .
> . . .  has 0 miles on it, while a Sub is coming from a wrecked
>Legacy with probably 100K on it.  I just can't decide which is better >>
>
>Greg,
>
>Since I have spent what seems like the better part of my life screwing around
>with 4 used Vanagons, all I can say is that a new I4 is probably 100K better.
>
>Rich


The EJ-series Subaru engine has a hugely good reputation for not wearing
out or breaking. So ignoring its smoothness and power advantages, a used
one is probably 100k better than a new VW I-4...


Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin, New Zealand
<andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
ph   64 (3) 473-8863
fax 64 (3) 479-7527
84 VW Caravelle GL (to be fitted with SVX engine & Porsche G50 trans) RWD
87 Corolla 1.8 DX CE80 diesel sedan FWD
89 Corolla 1.8 DX CE96 diesel van/wagon FWD
89 Corona 2.0 D Select CT170 diesel sedan FWD
92 Toyota Estima Lucida (=Previa) 2.2 turbodiesel RWD