Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2001, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:49:44 EDT
Reply-To:     WarmerWagen@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Keezer <WarmerWagen@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: On Transmission Ratios, Diesels, Conversions and Fish
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

In a message dated 10/24/01 2:08:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, FrankGRUN@AOL.COM writes:

> .<< From my > perspective, cruising in top gear at 60 mph is pretty close to a good > optimal > operating condition>> > > I found it!Driveability for the target audience. (not the store)

This is why I had to go to a . 457 air-cooled Vanagon trans. > > Here in the land of the 2nd worst US traffic, 60 mph translates to being > parked while traffic is passing by on all sides at 10+mph. > And forget a fast trip anywhere the limits allow 70 or 75mpg which I drive > on several road trips a year. > There may be a loss of pulling power on long hills in fourth, but third > takes care of that. The 5.Th reason if I may add in the consideration of final drives is Drivability, which is a relative term. If you tow or are carrying a large payload, then a lowered geared trans makes sense. If you want to cruise at 70 all day @3800 rpm(20 mpg my 82 Westfalia with 195/75/14's) then the air-cooled Vanagon will do this. I have driven two 1.8 Vanagon Westfalia conversions recently and they are SLOW. The first three gears all seem like first. I have a hill nearby which I can top at 45 in my Westy. The two Westies I drove with the Diesel trans would only top the hill at thirty-five. But I am sure that If both were pulling a 2,500 LB trailer payload, the Diesel would win. It is slow, but the torque challenges gravity better. In my Westfalia with the 2.0 Golf engine I can get up to 75 mph in third @4800 rpm.This is the best power gear and it lets you accelerate with ease at low or high rpm. To do the same with a Diesel trans I will assume that you need an additional 1000 rpm. That's winding it out, not that it can't take it, but the 1.8 is not the engine the 2.0 is. I know this from driving the 1.8 for 4 years, and the 2.0 for three. The 2.0 and a four/speed or five speed . 457 trans is going to suit most conversionists of the Tiico or scratch persuasion. A few who are in slow country and drive hilly backroads, dirt roads, will like the lowered geared Diesel trans. It would be best if we could have a high/low transfer case. So I can only speak for my self, and as Frank has explained, there are virtues to the Diesel trans. However, around here I was unable to sell mine.


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.