Because I get cornfused with the conversion using metric nautical tons. tim in san jose
>Why not just use Nm... 202Nm makes that 149ft-lbs TDI look a lot better ;) > >David Marshall > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf >Of Aristotle Sagan >Sent: November 19, 2001 5:54 PM >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: torque ? > > >deevide! deevide! deevide! > >inches to feets. not feets to inches. > >tim in san jose. > > > > >John, > > > >According to Snap On, multiply by 12. > > > >Walt Spak > >Pittsburgh, PA. > >wnsopc3@3rdm.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Lunetta 1990 Vanagon GL > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:20 PM > > Subject: torque ? > > > > > > Does anyone know how to convert inch pounds to foot pounds? > > Thanks, John 1990 vanagon gl > >
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.