Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2001, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:52:12 -0800
Reply-To:     Tim <tim@CWO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Tim <tim@CWO.COM>
Subject:      Re: [vanagon] Re: TIICO vs. CA
Comments: To: Aristotle Sagan <killer_jupiter@HOTMAIL.COM>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252

Also, CA tightened there emissions requirements about a year ago. They are making tougher about every two years. One of these days you won't see an 80's vehicle on the road. Yeah right. But that seems to be their goal.

Tim O

> Sorry Ken, your leg was pulled. > All vehicles go through a visual inspection before they hook up the sensors. > They check for specific emmissions control items such as EGR valves, type of > fuel system, number of cylinders, etc. If you mucked with it, it fails. They > won't even do the test. > Some of these people have really wierd test setups though. One guy had this > huge butterfly shaped inductance sensor that couldn't pick out just the one > ignition wire that it was suppose to. We wound up putting it over the > battery.! It worked. ??? > > I thinks tiico needs to do their homework like Kennedy did with the Subaru > conversion kits to be fair to their California customers. If I were gonna do > a conversion... Subie power it would be just for that reason. Or find a > holed diesel westy and do the I4 that way. > > Do I think the system is right or fair? Nope, but we live with it and our > air beats the heck out of NYC, Wash DC and most other East Coast Cities. > That's a far cry from what it was like in the mid seventies when I stationed > out here. > > tim obrien (breathing relatively clean air) in San Jose > > > >I talked to Peter about how this problem with smog in California happened > >since he had some vans that passed smog in that state. He said that a > >Vanagon with a waterboxer in it had been flagged by an earlier inspection > >as > >a "gross polluter". When the customer went back to the inspection station > >with the much cleaner running Tiico, this set off all kinds of alarms at > >the > >smog center. Why did this van go from being a heavy smoker to a clean > >burner? They looked under the lid and saw the evil non-stock engine > >configuration and didn't pass it. I mean who cares if the engine in there > >now is cleaner burning than the waterboxer ever was? The only thing that > >matters is that all of the proper hoops were jumped through and that the > >proper palms are greased. Give me a break!!! > > > >Thanks, > >Ken Wilford > >John 3:16 > >www.vanagain.com > >Phone: (856)-765-1583 > >Fax: (856)-327-2242 > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.