Date:         Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:21:56 -0600
Reply-To:     John Hawk <jhawk@HAWKCOMPUTING.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Hawk <jhawk@HAWKCOMPUTING.COM>
Subject:      I see.  Thanks.   RE: Shouldn't the listsrv set the reply to
              vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com?
Comments: To: TCarrington@ReliTech.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Yes I see what you mean.  Thanks.

>>> "Carrington, Tom" <TCarrington@ReliTech.com> 12/28 9:19 AM >>>
Hi John,

Trust me, it's better this way. We used to have the default reply set to the
list address, and I lost count of how many times responses that were
supposed to be delivered personally were shared with the entire list.

Although a few times it was kinda entertaining! :o

TomC
tcarrington@relitech.com 
http://volksweb.relitech.com 
85 VW Vanagon Crew Cab
82 VW Westy Diesel=>Gas Conversion
81 Checker A-11 (Taxi)
65 VW Notchback



-----Original Message-----
From: John Hawk [mailto:jhawk@HAWKCOMPUTING.COM] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:04 AM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM 
Subject: Shouldn't the listsrv set the reply to
vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com? 


I think we are all missing valuable replies to posts since when we hit reply
the reply is to the orginal sender.  I have been manually changing the 
reply to address.

John