Date:         Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:12:15 -0800
Reply-To:     mike miller <mwmiller@CWNET.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mike miller <mwmiller@CWNET.COM>
Subject:      Re: higher octane needs
Comments: To: Stan Wilder <wilden1@juno.com>
In-Reply-To:  <20011228.160102.-693579.2.wilden1@juno.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

then they can run even lower octane.  High altitude = less air = less
compression = less octane.

Unless I'm wrong about this too.

Mike

> From: Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
> Reply-To: Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM>
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:41:50 -0600
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: higher octane needs
>
> They were counting on fuel being the same for many years. Most new fuels
> have anti knock compounds added along with the Green Peace juices. I
> think everybody runs regular unleaded in their vans unless they have a
> special high altitude run to make to a ski area.
>
> Stan
>
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:04:35 EST Jim Morgan <JM060356@AOL.COM> writes:
>> In my owners manuel It states 91 octane . That  is premium go juice.
>> The p.o.
>> of my
>> 86 GL used min 93 if not 94 SUNOCO. Still has original heads @ 186k
>> on it.As
>> it was explained to me and i took the pleadge higher octane Lower
>> combustion
>> temps,
>> higher milage and less ware on the componets hoses/seals do not dry
>> out. I
>> know thatyou will not agree but I cannot argue the end result on
>> this
>> vanagon.
>>
>> Jim Morgan  86GL "Breadbox"
>>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
>