Date:         Fri, 28 Dec 2001 16:22:27 -0600
Reply-To:     Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>
Subject:      Re: higher octane needs
Comments: To: JM060356@AOL.COM
In-Reply-To:  <bc.1f1de954.295e2a53@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Jim,

Does your manual specify 91 RON octane?  Check this out:

http://www.type2.com/bartnik/octane.htm

There's a difference between RON octane, the Euro-rating, and our octane.

Chris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf
Of Jim Morgan
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:05 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: higher octane needs


In my owners manuel It states 91 octane . That  is premium go juice. The
p.o.
of my
86 GL used min 93 if not 94 SUNOCO. Still has original heads @ 186k on it.As
it was explained to me and i took the pleadge higher octane Lower combustion
temps,
higher milage and less ware on the componets hoses/seals do not dry out. I
know thatyou will not agree but I cannot argue the end result on this
vanagon.

Jim Morgan  86GL "Breadbox"