Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2002, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:45:36 -0800
Reply-To:     Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Subject:      Vanagon weight distribution, was Re: A Snow Story
Comments: To: Dan Snow <dieselvanagon@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <F170nAqpfkNsjUHQHh2000002c7@hotmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Dan et al,

The myth of rear weight bias in a Vanagon dies hard!

have you ever weighed your van? I think you'll find that it is close to 50/50 weight distribution.

My 82 westy (ex diesel) at hwy weigh scale:

Rolled the front wheels on: 980 kg Entire van: 1850 kg Rear wheels: 870 kg

As is, that's a 53/47 weight distribution.

subtract "cargo" from front weight:

(approx. 50 litres of fuel, about 37 kg. human, about 90 kg)

gives:

853 kg front 1723 kg all 870 kg rear (assumed the same)

which results in an approx. 50/50 distribution

Road and Track reported the 80 air cooled passenger van having a test weight (with driver) of 1594 kg, 55/45 front/rear distribution.

Road and track reported the 83.5 1.9 litre wasserboxer powered passenger van having a test weight (with driver) of 1650kg, and a weight distribution of 56/44 f/r.

Notice the wasserboxer has more forward weight bias! (who knows why?), the I4 in a westy has more on the weight on the rear wheels, but still not a rear weight bias like the old T1 or T2.

As others have mentioned, the lack of "compliance" of the Vanagon suspension (compared to the torsion arm etc set-up of the T1/T2) also puts it at a traction disadvantage when the ground becomes uneven, I have experienced this on more than one occasion (i.e., secondary logging road/winter stream bed, lots of river rock).

Alistair

> From: Dan Snow <dieselvanagon@HOTMAIL.COM> > Reply-To: Dan Snow <dieselvanagon@HOTMAIL.COM> > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:19:53 -0800 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: A Snow Story (Whoa-vanagon!!!) and Lessons Learned > > Cast iron vs. Aluminum: We got more weight over our drive wheels... > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.